top of page

Corporate Transparency Act Enforcement Halted: Implications for Small Businesses

  • Writer: Marino Tax Solutions
    Marino Tax Solutions
  • Dec 7, 2024
  • 4 min read

Updated: Dec 15, 2024


Marino Tax Solutions - Trump's Proposed Tax Changes

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) enforcement has been temporarily halted nationwide due to significant legal developments. On December 3, 2024, U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant in Texas issued a preliminary injunction against the CTA, citing constitutional concerns. This ruling comes mere weeks before the January 1, 2025, deadline for businesses to comply with the Act's Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) reporting requirements. This blog explores the key elements of the CTA, the court's reasoning, the broader implications for businesses, and how stakeholders can prepare for future developments.



Understanding the Corporate Transparency Act


Enacted in 2021, the Corporate Transparency Act was designed to enhance corporate accountability by requiring certain business entities to disclose their beneficial owners to the U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). The primary objective of the CTA is to combat illicit activities, such as money laundering and terrorist financing, by increasing transparency within corporate structures.


Entities subject to the CTA include limited liability companies (LLCs) and similar corporate entities, while publicly traded companies and larger corporations enjoy exemptions. The Act's provisions also seek to modernize financial oversight and close regulatory gaps that criminals often exploit. Despite its noble intent, the Act has faced significant pushback, particularly from small business owners concerned about privacy, cybersecurity risks, and the administrative burden of compliance


The Court's Rationale


Judge Amos Mazzant's ruling hinges on constitutional grounds, asserting that the CTA likely overreaches federal authority and infringes on states' rights as protected by the Tenth Amendment. He described the legislation as "quasi-Orwellian," critiquing its encroachment on domains traditionally governed by state law. This aligns with a prior decision from an Alabama federal court in March 2024, which similarly deemed the CTA unconstitutional. However, its injunction was limited to the plaintiffs in that specific case.


Judge Mazzant's decision highlights a growing debate over the balance of power between state and federal authorities. By framing the CTA as an overreach, the ruling underscores concerns about federal mandates imposing undue burdens on smaller businesses, which often lack the resources to adapt to sweeping regulatory changes.


Implications for Small Businesses


The nationwide injunction introduces significant uncertainty for the 32.6 million entities previously required to comply with the CTA's BOI reporting mandates. Many small business owners have already expressed frustration about the Act, citing concerns about privacy and the time required to meet its requirements. Judge Mazzant's decision is seen as a temporary reprieve for these businesses.


Small businesses have been vocal about the potential costs of compliance, which include dedicating resources to gather, verify, and submit beneficial ownership information. Critics argue that the Act places a disproportionate burden on small businesses compared to larger corporations that are exempt due to their existing reporting obligations.


Beth Milito of the National Federation of Independent Business encapsulated this sentiment: "The [beneficial ownership information] reporting requirements are a harmful invasion of small-business owners' privacy and a misuse of valuable time." Privacy advocates have also raised alarms about potential cybersecurity risks, given the sensitive nature of the collected and stored data.


Government Response and Next Steps


In response to the ruling, the U.S. Treasury Department has announced plans to appeal the decision, reaffirming its belief in the CTA's constitutionality. A FinCEN spokesperson remarked, "We continue to believe—consistent with the conclusions of other federal courts—that the CTA is constitutional." The Treasury Department has emphasized the CTA's role in strengthening financial oversight and curbing illicit activities, calling it a critical tool in protecting the integrity of the U.S. financial system.


As the legal battle unfolds, FinCEN may revisit its implementation strategies to address concerns raised by the courts and stakeholders. In the meantime, businesses are urged to remain vigilant and informed. Legal experts caution that while the injunction is in place, it may be temporary, and businesses should prepare for the possibility of renewed enforcement.


Broader Regulatory Implications


This case highlights a broader trend in regulatory challenges as businesses and governments grapple with balancing transparency, privacy, and administrative feasibility. The CTA's fate could set a precedent for other federal initiatives to enhance oversight in various sectors. It also raises questions about how effectively regulatory frameworks can be tailored to account for the diversity of entities they impact, from small businesses to multinational corporations.


Industry groups and advocacy organizations are likely to continue lobbying for reforms that mitigate compliance burdens while maintaining the Act's original intent. Stakeholders should monitor developments closely, as any amendments to the CTA could introduce new reporting thresholds or alternative mechanisms for achieving transparency.

Why Marino Tax Solutions?


The temporary halt of the Corporate Transparency Act's enforcement represents a pivotal moment for businesses across the United States. While small business owners may welcome this pause, the legal battle is far from over. Marino Tax Solutions actively monitors the latest tax changes, including updates on the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), to ensure our clients receive accurate guidance for making informed financial choices. Vigilance will not only ensure compliance but also safeguard businesses against potential penalties in the future.


Curious about how these tax changes could impact your personal or business finances? Marino Tax Solutions is here to assist you. Contact us today for a Free Consultation and customized tax planning solutions to help you stay ahead and capitalize on these new opportunities.


Disclaimer: The information provided in this blog is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered tax advice. Tax laws are complex and subject to change. Please consult with a tax professional like Marino Tax Solutions to discuss your specific circumstances.

Marino Tax Solutions
Marino Tax Solutions

200 S Andrews Ave Ste 504
Fort Lauderdale, Fl 33301

support@marinotaxsolutions.com

(888) 252-9971

  • Instagram
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Youtube

Connect With Us

© 2025 Marino Tax Solutions. All rights Reserved.

* Estimates and declarations regarding the effectiveness of our services are drawn from historical outcomes, and the testimonials presented are based on the unique details of each client's case. The results we achieve vary from one individual to another, influenced by factors such as your specific financial situation and your capability to supply Marino Tax Solutions with accurate and timely information. Marino Tax Solutions does not guarantee that a set amount or percentage will reduce your tax liability, that your tax debt will be settled within a predetermined time frame, or that you will be eligible for any specific IRS programs. Penalties and interest will accrue until your tax obligation is fully satisfied with the IRS. Marino Tax Solutions is an independent tax resolution service that is not affiliated with the IRS. We do not assume tax debt, pay taxing authorities or creditors, or offer bankruptcy, accounting, tax, or legal advice.

bottom of page